How do I send my supps out now that they're ready?

Once you've completed the work you need to do with your supps, you select at least one of them in the supp search results, and choose the Action | Mark as ready to send… menu item. This will result in the system trying to change the status of all supps in the workflow to ready to send. If it succeeds, you can then go to Data transfer | Export data | New Export | Supplementaries menu item. The export box will show a list of districts from which you can select the districts for which you want to export the supps.

Obviously, things can go wrong. MVOW does a bunch of validation checks before allowing you to mark a supp as ready to send, and here is the list. The system will replace items in braces with actual values. Codes 162 - 169 and 903 can be elevated to errors in Contractor | Options | Supplementaries.

Severity	Code	Message
W	162	The sum of the new land values ({sum_new_values}) is less than the sum of the land values of the cancelled entries ({sum_cancelled_values})
W	163	The sum of the new land values ({sum_new_values}) is greater than or equal to the sum of the land values of the cancelled entries multiplied by the factor ({cancelled_x_factor})
W	164	The land value of one of the new properties ({land_value}) is greater than or equal to the sum of the land values of the cancelled properties ({sum_cancelled_values})
W	165	The sum of new land values ({sum_new_values}) is outside the authorised factor range
W	166	There are the same or fewer new entries ({new_property_count}) than cancelled entries ({cancelled_property_count}) but the sum of the new land values ({sum_new_values}) is greater than the sum of the land values of the cancelled entries ({sum_cancelled_values})
W	167	The sum of the new land values ({sum_new_values}) is less than 80% of the sum of the land values of the cancelled entries ({sum_cancelled_values})
W	168	The new land value of property ({land_value}) is outside the authorised factor range
W	169	The new land value of property ({land_value}) is greater than the sale price ({sale_price}) in the same valuing year
W	900	Some required worksheet information is unavailable for this RR-{risk_rating} property: {missing_ws_list}
W	903	The 585-attributable-part ({attrib_value}) differs from the 62K-unutilised-value-allowance ({unutil_value})
E	001	Record was rejected as land value ({land_value}) is invalid, land value must be greater than or equal to 1
E	002	Record was rejected as an Onland14L(1)(a) allowance ({onsite_value}) must be greater than 0 and less than the land value ({land_value})
E	003	Record was rejected as an Offland14L(1)(b) allowance ({offsite_value}) must be greater than 0 and less than the land value ({land_value})
E	005	Record was rejected as an Subdivider 14T allowance ({subdiv_value}) must be greater than or equal to 0 and less than the land value ({land_value})
E	007	Record was rejected as the Statum14L(2) allowance ({stratum_value}) must be greater than 0 and less than the land value ({land_value}) and, if present, a MUAF, MDAF, ONLAND allowance, OFFLAND allowance, SUBDIVDER allowance, Sec 62K Land Tax concession or Sec 585 Local Govt concession must not exist
E	008	Record was rejected as an MDAF (14X) allowance ({mdaf_value}) must be greater than 0 and less than 100 and STRATUM allowance, ONLAND allowance, OFFLAND allowance, SUBDIVDER allowance, Sec 62K Land Tax concession, Sec 585 Local Govt concession or MUAF must not exist
E	009	Record was rejected as a Heritage (SHL) land value ({heritage_value}) must be greater than 0 and less than or equal to the land value ({land_value}) and must not have Land Value basis of heritage restricted concession (14G)
E	011	Record was rejected as where a Section 62K ({attrib_value}) or Section 585 Unutilised ({unutil_value}) value allowance exists, it must be greater than or equal to 0 and less than the land value ({land_value})
E	016	Record was rejected as the Date Valuation Made ({dvm}) must be greater than or equal to the base date ({base_date}) and less than or equal to the system date ({system_date})
E	021	Record was rejected as the land value/heritage value ({land_and_heritage_value}) must be greater than the sum of the STRATUM allowance, ONLAND allowance, OFFLAND allowance and the SUBDIVDER allowance ({stratum_onsite_offsite_subdiv_value})
E	030	Record was rejected as the MUAF (14BBA) allowance ({muaf_value}) must be greater than 0 and less than 100 and a MDAF, STRATUM allowance, ONLAND allowance, OFFLAND allowance, SUBDIVDER allowance, Sec 62K or Sec 585 concession must not exist
E	103	Record was rejected as the district code is missing
E	105	Record was rejected as the property ID is missing
E	106	Record was rejected as the contractor code is missing
E	107	Record was rejected as the workflow ID is missing
E	109	Record was rejected as the verification date ({verification_date}) cannot be earlier than the base date ({base_date})
E	119	Record was rejected as the land value is not provided in the contractor supplementary file
E	121	Record was rejected as the Base Date is missing
E	122	Record was rejected as the LV Authority legislation code is missing
E	123	Record was rejected as the LV Basis legislation code is missing
E	124	Record was rejected as the Date Valuation Made is missing
E	127	Record was rejected as the LV authority varies between years
E	130	Record was rejected as the Verification date is missing
E	131	Record was rejected as the Verification date ({verification_date}) cannot be earlier than the Date Valuation Made ({dvm})
E	132	Record was rejected as the verification type is missing
E	133	Record was rejected as the verification date ({verification_date}) is greater than the system date ({system_date})
E	140	Record was rejected and the verified land value was not created as the land value change was greater than 90% ({land_value_change})
E	160	Not all land values have the same Date Valuation Made
E	161	Not all land values have the same land value basis
E	172	Authority code 14A(1) is invalid for supps
E	174	Record was rejected as the contractor worksheet created field cannot be null and must have a value of Y or N
E	209	Record was rejected as the zone code is missing
E	210	Record was rejected as the component code is missing
E	251	Record was rejected as the risk rating information is incomplete
E	253	Record was rejected as the risk rating date is greater than the system date
E	254	Record was rejected as the risk rating date ({risk_rating_date}) cannot be earlier than the risk rating date of the prior land value ({prior_risk_rating_date}), or, where the risk rating has changed, earlier or equal to the risk rating date of the prior land value, or, earlier than the creation date of the property record ({creation_date}).
E	271	This is an objection (the auth code is 35B or 40), but the risk rating is not 1
E	272	Supps must have a verification methodology of VERIFIED or INSPECTD
E	273	The supp has a risk rating of 1 but is not verified
E	277	There is an allowance or concession, but the risk rating is 3
E	278	The property is zoned commercial, but the risk rating is 3
E	279	The property is zoned industrial, but the risk rating is 3
E	280	The property has a valuation basis of neither 6A(1) nor 14C but the risk rating is 3
E	500	Record was rejected because the risk rating date ({risk_rating_date}) is before November 1 of the current base year ({rating_date_limit}).
E	507	When the basis is either 26A or 28, there must be at least one related property
E	600	All supps in this workflow are already marked as ready to send, sent, or complete
E	601	Supps for WF ({workflow_id}} have conflicting authority codes
E	610	27B: the sum of the values of the new properties ({total_new_values}) must be greater than or equal to the sum of the values of the cancelled properties ({total_cancelled_values})
E	611	27B: the sum of the values of the new properties ({total_new_values}) must be less than 9 times the sum of the values of the cancelled properties ({total_cancelled_values})
E	612	27B: the value of one of the new properties (smallest value is {min_new_value}) must be less than the sum of the values of the cancelled properties ({total_cancelled_values})
E	613	27B: the sum of the values of the new properties ({total_new_values}) must be between half and twice the sum of the values of the cancelled properties ({total_cancelled_values})
E	620	27, 14A, 14A(1), 14A(2) or 14A(6): as there are more new properties ({new_property_count}) than cancelled properties ({cancelled_property_count}) the sum of the values of the new properties ({total_new_values}) must be greater than or equal to the sum of the values of the cancelled properties ({total_cancelled_values})
E	621	27, 14A, 14A(1), 14A(2) or 14A(6): as there are fewer or the same number of new properties ({new_property_count}) than cancelled properties ({cancelled_property_count}) the sum of the values of the new properties ({total_new_values}) must be less than or equal to the sum of the values of the cancelled properties ({total_cancelled_values})
E	630	Property is rejected as the future value is required, but not provided
E	901	Record was rejected as there are acknowledged errors but no valuer comment
E	902	The zone on the supp is not the same as the zone associated with the component
E	904	The presence of onsite/offsite/subdividers allowances on this supp varies between years

There are cases where what you've entered is valid, despite the validation. So at this point, you need to know that if you enter a valuer comment, you can acknowledge all error messages, and the system will mark the supp as ready to send.